Secondaries removal views ?
+10
barry_mcki
Kaupy1962
Dekenai
LouG
reddog
Reardo
2wheelsagain
kewwig
gus
Hammy
14 posters
Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Secondaries removal views ?
First topic message reminder :
'Crimsondawn' has been told by an ATRE seller that with installing their unit there is no need to remove the secondaries. What expeiences has anyone had with theirs ? My removal was nothing but GREAT !
'Crimsondawn' has been told by an ATRE seller that with installing their unit there is no need to remove the secondaries. What expeiences has anyone had with theirs ? My removal was nothing but GREAT !
Last edited by Hammy on Sat 02 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
If you do a nice neat cut job on the lid, you could always put it back on with some duct tape on each side. Not a bid deal really.
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
I use a " DNA " filter. Will last the life of your bike. Yes you do have to clean them and reoil them periodically. No big deal.
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
I just whacked another OEM filter in mine last week.
I have spent $36 in air filters in 30, 000 km
I have spent $36 in air filters in 30, 000 km
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
The trouble with the OEM filters is that they do not allow enough air through that some mods require. Alright if you leave your Bandit std, but just fitting an aftermarket flow thru can means that the air flow will be unbalanced with an OEM filter. JMO.
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Mate I agree. The FZ has a K&N
My point was there isn't any point in fitting one just for the hell of it and thinking the OEM wasn't any good.
My point was there isn't any point in fitting one just for the hell of it and thinking the OEM wasn't any good.
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
My point is that every action has a reaction. It's like baking a cake. If all the ingredience are not added, then the outcome will not be satisfactory.
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Yes the K&N needs oiling, but it's a fair distance between drinks, from their web site:
Quote...
4. How often do I need to clean my K&N air
filter?
If you have not experienced a decrease in mileage or engine performance,
chances are your filter is fine and does not yet need cleaning. To be more
specific, the filter does not require cleaning if you can still see the wire
screen on the entire air filter regardless of how dirty it may appear. When the
screen is no longer visible some place on the filter, it is time to clean it.
When used in normal paved road, street or highway conditions, our replacement
air filters that fit in the factory air box should require cleaning every 50,000
miles and our large conical filters on an intake system should require cleaning
every 100,000 miles. When used in dusty or off-road environments, our filters
will require cleaning more often. We recommend that you visually inspect your
filter once every 25,000 miles to determine if the screen is still visible.
Unquote.
The other little trick to allow more air is to use the 1200 filter (Part No SU-6000) instead of the 1250 (SU-6505), for some reason the later model has about 10% less filter surface:
Quote...
4. How often do I need to clean my K&N air
filter?
If you have not experienced a decrease in mileage or engine performance,
chances are your filter is fine and does not yet need cleaning. To be more
specific, the filter does not require cleaning if you can still see the wire
screen on the entire air filter regardless of how dirty it may appear. When the
screen is no longer visible some place on the filter, it is time to clean it.
When used in normal paved road, street or highway conditions, our replacement
air filters that fit in the factory air box should require cleaning every 50,000
miles and our large conical filters on an intake system should require cleaning
every 100,000 miles. When used in dusty or off-road environments, our filters
will require cleaning more often. We recommend that you visually inspect your
filter once every 25,000 miles to determine if the screen is still visible.
Unquote.
The other little trick to allow more air is to use the 1200 filter (Part No SU-6000) instead of the 1250 (SU-6505), for some reason the later model has about 10% less filter surface:
Joflewbyu2 likes this post
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
That k and n excerpt is bullshit. Mine gets a clean every oil change. It is simple with the cleaning kit.
reddog- Posts : 2523
Join date : 2010-09-27
Age : 46
Location : Allanson WA
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
+1reddog wrote:That k and n excerpt is bullshit. Mine gets a clean every oil change. It is simple with the cleaning kit.
More Rubber, Less paper!crimsondawn Today at 8:19 pm
There is 3 times the weight in the 1250 filter. Wonder what's going on there?
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
The weight difference is equivilant to whether you have a chocy milk for morno's or not
But because it is a slow Friday night (opps Saturday morning) here are a couple of differences I can see:
1. There is approx 20 ridges in the 1250 unit, 24 in the 1200, thats 20% less paper (or more rubber), .
2. The 1250 unit also has more rubber arround the edge of the filter area.
3. The oil kit is 23% larger.
So my original 10% is a little low, looks like it is 20% more rubber/less paper, as Reardo said above.
I think the reason for the additional rubber was to improve (decrease) air turbulance with the original snorkle and filter top, with the restricted breathing caused by the secondaries and OEM exhaust it probably helped with improved mileage or caused less induction noise. That all goes out the window when you start making the Bandit breath easier with the "go-fast" changes. As I have mentioned before, I'm not a mechanic so please feel free to correct any of these assumptions
But because it is a slow Friday night (opps Saturday morning) here are a couple of differences I can see:
1. There is approx 20 ridges in the 1250 unit, 24 in the 1200, thats 20% less paper (or more rubber), .
2. The 1250 unit also has more rubber arround the edge of the filter area.
3. The oil kit is 23% larger.
So my original 10% is a little low, looks like it is 20% more rubber/less paper, as Reardo said above.
I think the reason for the additional rubber was to improve (decrease) air turbulance with the original snorkle and filter top, with the restricted breathing caused by the secondaries and OEM exhaust it probably helped with improved mileage or caused less induction noise. That all goes out the window when you start making the Bandit breath easier with the "go-fast" changes. As I have mentioned before, I'm not a mechanic so please feel free to correct any of these assumptions
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Edit: Barry said it 10x better then me, So to save face. I deleted my post.crimsondawn wrote:I know that was probably tongue in cheek, but 10% less surface area doesn't add up to 60% more weight .
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Just remove the three bolts holding the radiator on. Then pull the radiator forward a little. I put a small rope around the back of it and tied it off to the forks. makes it a little easier to work. Be careful not to scratch the front frame. It is a pretty easy install if you follow the instructions.
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Not sure if the 1200 one fits.
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Yep - fits fine:
The only thing left of my airbox top is the ridge to keep the filter in place, doesn't seem to have caused any issues other than pushing the dyno numbers up. I did buy a new top just in case it went sour, still got it sitting on the work bench.
The only thing left of my airbox top is the ridge to keep the filter in place, doesn't seem to have caused any issues other than pushing the dyno numbers up. I did buy a new top just in case it went sour, still got it sitting on the work bench.
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Mine was starving for fuel arround this area according to the dyno-tune readout, had to have a bit more fuel added...
It was also running a bit too rich just past this a low throttle settings, that would cause it to bog down as well if it wasn't leaned off.
Unless you know a lot about how your EFI box workes, you really need to put it on the dyno to get the max out of these upgrades.
It was also running a bit too rich just past this a low throttle settings, that would cause it to bog down as well if it wasn't leaned off.
Unless you know a lot about how your EFI box workes, you really need to put it on the dyno to get the max out of these upgrades.
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
If you haven't add a power commander or TFI you need to get one or it'll be shit. Yes they run lean around those rpm for emissions reasons
reddog- Posts : 2523
Join date : 2010-09-27
Age : 46
Location : Allanson WA
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
The same here with the fueling.
Hey Barry, Why is you fuel map run all the way up to 11000rpm. Did your tuner start with GSF1200 map as a base?
Hey Barry, Why is you fuel map run all the way up to 11000rpm. Did your tuner start with GSF1200 map as a base?
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Not sure what he used as the base, must have been an awesome machine, would have had to have been another red one I'd say
The Rev Limiter came in on que at 9500 on every pull. There was a little discrepencicy between the dyno tach and the PC-V as I mentioned here
The Rev Limiter came in on que at 9500 on every pull. There was a little discrepencicy between the dyno tach and the PC-V as I mentioned here
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Are you now a believer Neo ? Welcome to the Matrix.
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
I originally had a TRE set to 5th, and a Delkevic can well before going TFi and Stage II. I found the surging stopped and it fueled much crisper throughout the rev range. However, removing the secondaries and opening the airbox up certainly took it up a notch. Well worth doing both IMO. In fact, the first thing I'll do when I buy another bike is take out the secondaries immediately, before I do anything else. They are simply the net-nanny of the engine world, designed to stop noobs looping their bikes in the lower gears.
geekay007- Posts : 208
Join date : 2011-02-09
Age : 53
Location : Sydney/Japan
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
the devil has visited
Mpottsy- Posts : 468
Join date : 2011-04-21
Age : 53
Location : Telopea, NSW
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Certainly has, and he has put your exhaust and rear brake on the wrong side!Mpottsy wrote:the devil has visited
Dekenai- Posts : 797
Join date : 2009-09-02
Location : Tuggers, ACT
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
And with a couple of clicks everything is back as it should be PHEW
Okay final checks
4x ally disks
8x very tinny tiny screw
Air Box cut open fully
TFi set to stage two
Connectors are secure
Fuel lines and breathers
Fairing back on
-COO
Nothing left on the work bench
Okay now for a test ride
Mpottsy- Posts : 468
Join date : 2011-04-21
Age : 53
Location : Telopea, NSW
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Ok, you had 3 days for that ride. Didja like the results?
kewwig- Posts : 985
Join date : 2011-03-21
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
» secondaries removal help
» FI light after Secondaries removal?
» Pulling secondaries.
» Air box and secondaries done.
» Secondaries again
» FI light after Secondaries removal?
» Pulling secondaries.
» Air box and secondaries done.
» Secondaries again
Page 2 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum