Secondaries removal views ?
+10
barry_mcki
Kaupy1962
Dekenai
LouG
reddog
Reardo
2wheelsagain
kewwig
gus
Hammy
14 posters
Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Secondaries removal views ?
'Crimsondawn' has been told by an ATRE seller that with installing their unit there is no need to remove the secondaries. What expeiences has anyone had with theirs ? My removal was nothing but GREAT !
Last edited by Hammy on Sat 02 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Well you might not NEED to remove them but i bet is BETTER to remove them .
gus- Posts : 6176
Join date : 2010-11-23
Age : 73
Location : Cygnet ,Tasmania
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
gus wrote:Well you might not NEED to remove them but i bet is BETTER to remove them .
Sung to the tune of an old Johnny Cash number. " How highs the water Gus " ?
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Hammy wrote:'Crimsondawn' has been told by an ATRE seller that with installing their unit there is no need to remove the secondaries. What expeiences has anyone had with theirs ? My removal was nothing but GREAT !
As part of the Dale Walker Stage II setup: fantastic.
With no other mods, a bit faster throttle response. I have done a few now and everyone loves the results. In fact, try and find anyone, anywhere in the world, who has regretted it
kewwig- Posts : 985
Join date : 2011-03-21
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
kewwig wrote:Hammy wrote:'Crimsondawn' has been told by an ATRE seller that with installing their unit there is no need to remove the secondaries. What expeiences has anyone had with theirs ? My removal was nothing but GREAT !
As part of the Dale Walker Stage II setup: fantastic.
With no other mods, a bit faster throttle response. I have done a few now and everyone loves the results. In fact, try and find anyone, anywhere in the world, who has regretted it
There is someone on this forum who put theirs back in
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
OK, one person in the world then!
kewwig- Posts : 985
Join date : 2011-03-21
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
And he's is from N.Z so that doesnt count .
gus- Posts : 6176
Join date : 2010-11-23
Age : 73
Location : Cygnet ,Tasmania
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
I can't see how a ATRE stops secondaries chocking anything. Some salesman will say anything to get a sale!
secondaries
No secondaries
secondaries
No secondaries
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Piss of the secondaries. Then the computer can't tell you how much throttle you can have. Before removing them I can't remember power wheelying the bike. These days I get a big grin happenening when the front wheel goes skyward Then it hits the limiter and comes back down
reddog- Posts : 2523
Join date : 2010-09-27
Age : 46
Location : Allanson WA
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Healtech say that their GIPro allows quicker opening of the secondaries in the 6th gear map. It's not the same as removing them as it doen't affect the secondaries partly closing at high revs.
LouG- Posts : 5
Join date : 2011-07-31
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
All the ATRE can do is to fool the ECU into thinking the bike is in whatever gear the ATRE is set to. So, what he salesman appears to be saying is these engines are effectively restricted by the ECU using the secondaries to determine how much it will give you in the restricted gears (1 - 4). The side benefit of the ATRE is that, unless you are prepared to pay heaps to have your powercommander (or similar) mapped in each gear (if the unit has that ability); then you can use it to fool the ECU into thinking it is in one gear (5 th in my case) and only have to build one map. BTW when the fuse powering the ATRE blew, my idle was really rough. I believe this is because when neutral is selected the ATRE tells the ECU to use the neutral map with the nice smooth idle. With the ATRE unpowered there is effectively no output from the gear position sensor so ECU defaults to the 6th gear map for all gears and neutral, (think its 6th).
As far as I am aware the primary advantage of secondary removal is throttle response, don't think it makes that much difference in peak output.
As far as I am aware the primary advantage of secondary removal is throttle response, don't think it makes that much difference in peak output.
Dekenai- Posts : 797
Join date : 2009-09-02
Location : Tuggers, ACT
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
It was meeeeeeee!!!!
No difference on my bike with or without.
No difference on my bike with or without.
Kaupy1962- Posts : 1051
Join date : 2011-06-22
Age : 62
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
But had you done the airbox mod as well ? I think you need all the pieces of the puzzle to make it work. Like putting a can on your std headers. It will sound good, but to get the real benefits you need to replace the std headrs as well. Better flow. Less restriction. JMO.Kaupy1962 wrote:It was meeeeeeee!!!!
No difference on my bike with or without.
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
+1Hammy wrote:you need all the pieces of the puzzle to make it work..
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Hammy wrote:But had you done the airbox mod as well ? I think you need all the pieces of the puzzle to make it work. Like putting a can on your std headers. It will sound good, but to get the real benefits you need to replace the std headrs as well. Better flow. Less restriction. JMO.Kaupy1962 wrote:It was meeeeeeee!!!!
No difference on my bike with or without.
Snorkel has been taken out
Kaupy1962- Posts : 1051
Join date : 2011-06-22
Age : 62
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
crimsondawn wrote:Does removing the secondaries cause fueling to lean out?
Not that I could tell. If done carefully, the procedure can be reversed if your not happy. 99% are more than happy.
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
I think the issue is more than just whether it will run lean afterwards. I am not a mechanic and have picked up most of my knowledge by following what others have done, but to me if you are removing the secondaries for anything but performance you might want to rethink your approach. IMO you would not be getting the optimum performance if you didn't add the PC-V(or III) or the Dale Walker (Dobeck) TFI and their associated tune-up settings.
As mentioned by a couple on here previously, the secondary removal is part of an "upgrade package" that usually includes the headers, can, airbox lid and ECU tuner box. With the Dale Walker TFI setups there is a tried and proven tuneup configuration that seem to produce pretty good numbers (I think Dale Walker has put his Bandit over 200 dyno runs to get this nutted out). A number of us that went the PC-V route also forked out for a dyno-tune to get the maximum out of the Bandit over the full rev and gear range.
Why don't you try to catch up with one of us that has done the removal and compare the difference, 130 rwhp puts the Bandit into a different arena, also causes your face to ache due to the big grin on your dial
As mentioned by a couple on here previously, the secondary removal is part of an "upgrade package" that usually includes the headers, can, airbox lid and ECU tuner box. With the Dale Walker TFI setups there is a tried and proven tuneup configuration that seem to produce pretty good numbers (I think Dale Walker has put his Bandit over 200 dyno runs to get this nutted out). A number of us that went the PC-V route also forked out for a dyno-tune to get the maximum out of the Bandit over the full rev and gear range.
Why don't you try to catch up with one of us that has done the removal and compare the difference, 130 rwhp puts the Bandit into a different arena, also causes your face to ache due to the big grin on your dial
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Just do it.. you will not regret it.
If you are a bit worried about it as stated get one of the members here that have done it give you a hand. It's a couple of hours tops
If you are a bit worried about it as stated get one of the members here that have done it give you a hand. It's a couple of hours tops
reddog- Posts : 2523
Join date : 2010-09-27
Age : 46
Location : Allanson WA
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Just follow Reardo's write up. Don't remove the throttle bodies from the bike and the throttle cables as they are an absolute bitch to get back on. You need a set of JIS drivers or you'll be drilling the broken screw out. I had to do it to one of mine prior to buying the proper screw drivers from the states.
reddog- Posts : 2523
Join date : 2010-09-27
Age : 46
Location : Allanson WA
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
The need for the JIS screwdrivers is a bit of an urban myth. The main trick in getting the screws out is to break the locktite. This is what I used:
These came from the local Jaycar store, the screw driver set is TD-2026 ($19.95), and the pencil torch is TS-1667 ($11.95).
I did eventually get a set of JIS screwdrivers from the US, they arrived about 2 weeks after I had taken the secondaries out.
BTW, this is what happens if you use too small a screwdriver and apply the heat to it instead of the screw:
Edit...
And this is a photo of a JIS (on the left) compared to the Jaycar equilivant:
These came from the local Jaycar store, the screw driver set is TD-2026 ($19.95), and the pencil torch is TS-1667 ($11.95).
I did eventually get a set of JIS screwdrivers from the US, they arrived about 2 weeks after I had taken the secondaries out.
BTW, this is what happens if you use too small a screwdriver and apply the heat to it instead of the screw:
Edit...
And this is a photo of a JIS (on the left) compared to the Jaycar equilivant:
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Pity you didn't see this thread earlier as well, makes it a little easier to put back together....Airbox & Secondaries
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
crimsondawn wrote:Too late. Throttle bodies are out, cables are off, taking to work tomorrow .reddog wrote:Just follow Reardo's write up. Don't remove the throttle bodies from the bike and the throttle cables as they are an absolute bitch to get back on. You need a set of JIS drivers or you'll be drilling the broken screw out. I had to do it to one of mine prior to buying the proper screw drivers from the states.
I eagerly await your verdict. Please consider upgrading your air filter to a high flow type, and opening up the airbox lid.
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
You will see a hose that runs up under the r/h side of the tank. Has a joiner about half way up. Just pull apart. Block up and push back together.
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
crimsondawn wrote:That the one that goes into the airbox? About as thick as your little finger.
Yip.
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: Secondaries removal views ?
Would not mod the lid w/out adding a fuel controller. This is the mod that lets a 'lot' more air through.
Dekenai- Posts : 797
Join date : 2009-09-02
Location : Tuggers, ACT
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
» secondaries removal help
» FI light after Secondaries removal?
» Pulling secondaries.
» Air box and secondaries done.
» Secondaries again
» FI light after Secondaries removal?
» Pulling secondaries.
» Air box and secondaries done.
» Secondaries again
Page 1 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum