B1200 vs B1250
+13
Hammy
rolls
chips
paul
mtbeerwah
holdenman
reddog
gus
2wheelsagain
Re-Cycled
dhula
Reardo
Ironman
17 posters
Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
B1200 vs B1250
First topic message reminder :
Hey Riders,
Those of us who ride B12's will probably know that the engine starts to kick from 6000rpm and up. By that I mean if you are in or slightly above that rpm and you grab a fist full of throttle it will haul. Or if you do the same but at say 5,000rpm you will notice a power band once you reach 6K+. Front wheel gets really light or even comes away - feels good when you're expecting it to happen.
Now on my 1250FA I'm not finding any real kick. It has K&N, Healtech FI tuner, X-TRE, Two Bros slip on. Torque down low and mid is excellent and I would say superior to the B12 in that department.
Up the higher end it's just not there. Reason I bring this up is today I hit the rev limiter totally by accident whilst waiting for the power to come on. Yes it powered away but not like my B12 with a poor mans stage 1 (jets, needle adjustment, K&N, slipon and 1.5" hole in the airbox lid).
Am I comparing apples with apples or have I got it all wrong and the FA is just in need of a set of Yoshimura cams?
Summing it up, I'm feeling a bit dissapointed in my FA when I compare it with my old K6 B12.
A penny for your thoughts.
Hey Riders,
Those of us who ride B12's will probably know that the engine starts to kick from 6000rpm and up. By that I mean if you are in or slightly above that rpm and you grab a fist full of throttle it will haul. Or if you do the same but at say 5,000rpm you will notice a power band once you reach 6K+. Front wheel gets really light or even comes away - feels good when you're expecting it to happen.
Now on my 1250FA I'm not finding any real kick. It has K&N, Healtech FI tuner, X-TRE, Two Bros slip on. Torque down low and mid is excellent and I would say superior to the B12 in that department.
Up the higher end it's just not there. Reason I bring this up is today I hit the rev limiter totally by accident whilst waiting for the power to come on. Yes it powered away but not like my B12 with a poor mans stage 1 (jets, needle adjustment, K&N, slipon and 1.5" hole in the airbox lid).
Am I comparing apples with apples or have I got it all wrong and the FA is just in need of a set of Yoshimura cams?
Summing it up, I'm feeling a bit dissapointed in my FA when I compare it with my old K6 B12.
A penny for your thoughts.
Ironman- Posts : 672
Join date : 2010-10-09
Location : ACT
Re: B1200 vs B1250
Had a bit of a chat to Holeshot Performance. His headers seem to really awaken the 1250 up.
I think I will go down this route. Secondaries out - TB sync and TPS check. Fit headers and down to the dyno to set it all up.
Wonder how the 1250 would go with all this AND a pair of Yoshi cams?
I think whichever way you go - PC3 / PCV, TFI, Juicebox or Healtech FI Tuner Pro - all will deliver results.
I think I will go down this route. Secondaries out - TB sync and TPS check. Fit headers and down to the dyno to set it all up.
Wonder how the 1250 would go with all this AND a pair of Yoshi cams?
I think whichever way you go - PC3 / PCV, TFI, Juicebox or Healtech FI Tuner Pro - all will deliver results.
Ironman- Posts : 672
Join date : 2010-10-09
Location : ACT
Re: B1200 vs B1250
Full Throttle wrote:Had a bit of a chat to Holeshot Performance. His headers seem to really awaken the 1250 up.
I think I will go down this route. Secondaries out - TB sync and TPS check. Fit headers and down to the dyno to set it all up.
Wonder how the 1250 would go with all this AND a pair of Yoshi cams?
I think whichever way you go - PC3 / PCV, TFI, Juicebox or Healtech FI Tuner Pro - all will deliver results.
I just got 130hp out of a mate's with the Dale Walker headers, TFI, open airbox/K and N and secondaries out. He is very happy. Got some photos of Dale's headers when I did the install at: http://kewwibike.blogspot.com/2011/10/holeshot-headers.html
kewwig- Posts : 985
Join date : 2011-03-21
Re: B1200 vs B1250
That's a good and impressive effort.kewwig wrote:Full Throttle wrote:Had a bit of a chat to Holeshot Performance. His headers seem to really awaken the 1250 up.
I think I will go down this route. Secondaries out - TB sync and TPS check. Fit headers and down to the dyno to set it all up.
Wonder how the 1250 would go with all this AND a pair of Yoshi cams?
I think whichever way you go - PC3 / PCV, TFI, Juicebox or Healtech FI Tuner Pro - all will deliver results.
I just got 130hp out of a mate's with the Dale Walker headers, TFI, open airbox/K and N and secondaries out. He is very happy. Got some photos of Dale's headers when I did the install at: http://kewwibike.blogspot.com/2011/10/holeshot-headers.html
Shall I break out the FZ1 specs?
Re: B1200 vs B1250
4wheelsagain wrote:That's a good and impressive effort.kewwig wrote:Full Throttle wrote:Had a bit of a chat to Holeshot Performance. His headers seem to really awaken the 1250 up.
I think I will go down this route. Secondaries out - TB sync and TPS check. Fit headers and down to the dyno to set it all up.
Wonder how the 1250 would go with all this AND a pair of Yoshi cams?
I think whichever way you go - PC3 / PCV, TFI, Juicebox or Healtech FI Tuner Pro - all will deliver results.
I just got 130hp out of a mate's with the Dale Walker headers, TFI, open airbox/K and N and secondaries out. He is very happy. Got some photos of Dale's headers when I did the install at: http://kewwibike.blogspot.com/2011/10/holeshot-headers.html
Shall I break out the FZ1 specs?
If you must......
chips- Posts : 437
Join date : 2011-10-06
Age : 38
Location : Roma Qld
Re: B1200 vs B1250
chips wrote:4wheelsagain wrote:That's a good and impressive effort.kewwig wrote:Full Throttle wrote:Had a bit of a chat to Holeshot Performance. His headers seem to really awaken the 1250 up.
I think I will go down this route. Secondaries out - TB sync and TPS check. Fit headers and down to the dyno to set it all up.
Wonder how the 1250 would go with all this AND a pair of Yoshi cams?
I think whichever way you go - PC3 / PCV, TFI, Juicebox or Healtech FI Tuner Pro - all will deliver results.
I just got 130hp out of a mate's with the Dale Walker headers, TFI, open airbox/K and N and secondaries out. He is very happy. Got some photos of Dale's headers when I did the install at: http://kewwibike.blogspot.com/2011/10/holeshot-headers.html
Shall I break out the FZ1 specs?
If you must......
Nar don't want to piss people off even more. Trying to be a good boy
Re: B1200 vs B1250
4wheelsagain wrote:chips wrote:4wheelsagain wrote:That's a good and impressive effort.kewwig wrote:Full Throttle wrote:Had a bit of a chat to Holeshot Performance. His headers seem to really awaken the 1250 up.
I think I will go down this route. Secondaries out - TB sync and TPS check. Fit headers and down to the dyno to set it all up.
Wonder how the 1250 would go with all this AND a pair of Yoshi cams?
I think whichever way you go - PC3 / PCV, TFI, Juicebox or Healtech FI Tuner Pro - all will deliver results.
I just got 130hp out of a mate's with the Dale Walker headers, TFI, open airbox/K and N and secondaries out. He is very happy. Got some photos of Dale's headers when I did the install at: http://kewwibike.blogspot.com/2011/10/holeshot-headers.html
Shall I break out the FZ1 specs?
If you must......
Nar don't want to piss people off even more. Trying to be a good boy
paul- Posts : 7740
Join date : 2011-08-19
Age : 72
Location : Morphett Vale Sth. Aust.
Re: B1200 vs B1250
Kewwig, On your mates bike, were Dales stage 2 TFI settings changed due to the headers installed?
Boatz- Posts : 405
Join date : 2011-03-09
Age : 64
Location : The Gong
Re: B1200 vs B1250
4wheelsagain wrote:chips wrote:4wheelsagain wrote:That's a good and impressive effort.kewwig wrote:Full Throttle wrote:Had a bit of a chat to Holeshot Performance. His headers seem to really awaken the 1250 up.
I think I will go down this route. Secondaries out - TB sync and TPS check. Fit headers and down to the dyno to set it all up.
Wonder how the 1250 would go with all this AND a pair of Yoshi cams?
I think whichever way you go - PC3 / PCV, TFI, Juicebox or Healtech FI Tuner Pro - all will deliver results.
I just got 130hp out of a mate's with the Dale Walker headers, TFI, open airbox/K and N and secondaries out. He is very happy. Got some photos of Dale's headers when I did the install at: http://kewwibike.blogspot.com/2011/10/holeshot-headers.html
Shall I break out the FZ1 specs?
If you must......
Nar don't want to piss people off even more. Trying to be a good boy
BS......
chips- Posts : 437
Join date : 2011-10-06
Age : 38
Location : Roma Qld
Re: B1200 vs B1250
4wheelsagain wrote:
Nar don't want to piss people off even more. Trying to be a good boy
But you know your gonna.
Hammy- Posts : 4446
Join date : 2011-08-09
Age : 65
Location : The Rock
Re: B1200 vs B1250
Hammy wrote:4wheelsagain wrote:
Nar don't want to piss people off even more. Trying to be a good boy
But you know your gonna.
Re: B1200 vs B1250
Boatz wrote:Kewwig, On your mates bike, were Dales stage 2 TFI settings changed due to the headers installed?
Yes. He bought the TFI and headers and K and N from Dale, who had set the TFI to what you could describe as Stage III, which is essentially a fully opened airbox and his headers on top of the Stage II setup, which I have. I was initially worried about the settings being different to mine, as I wouldn't have thought the headers would make such a difference, but there you go. (And in accordance with Dale's request to clients, his settings aren't shared, so please, no one go asking me for them).
I pulled the secondaries at the same time as I fitted the headers, so it went from stock (other than a slip-on) to Stage III. This is the third 1250 I have fitted with the TFI/pulled secondaries and I am absolutely convinced of the benefits, and can do the mods quite quickly.
I haven't bothered to dyno my bike as it is really an academic exercise. It's faster and more responsive and I like it a lot. My mate was interested in the results, so he paid $93 for a dyno test at local dealers Motormart (Honda), and they reported 130.8 hp at 270 km/hr on the dyno. I wasn't there, but have no reason to disbelieve him. Sport Rider got 27 extra hp with those mods. Their initial dyno reading was low, but the proportion change is similar.
Dale posts dyno pulls of 132.2 hp and 96.29 lb/ft (see below), so my mate's results are consistent. I haven't ridden his since doing the work, but riding with him it absolutely flies and he's a big guy. If we were going to do it scientifically we would have dynoed it before I touched it, but why bother.
Source: www.holeshot.com
I can see some sceptics chiming in, but the results are consistent. I'll see if I can get a copy of his results and post them.
Personally I wouldn't bother with the headers as they cost too much to get to NZ. I'd rather get better handling and do the suspension.
Last edited by kewwig on Wed 25 Jan 2012, 4:19 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Forgot photo)
kewwig- Posts : 985
Join date : 2011-03-21
Re: B1200 vs B1250
I'm converted. Doing it ASAP - all of the above mods!
Ironman- Posts : 672
Join date : 2010-10-09
Location : ACT
Re: B1200 vs B1250
Full Throttle wrote:I'm converted. Doing it ASAP - all of the above mods!
Even Stage II without the headers is pretty good. It really gets up an howls and the rideability is just as good as ever, but more torque and power
kewwig- Posts : 985
Join date : 2011-03-21
Re: B1200 vs B1250
Bugger, I came over here to get better power/torqure, (weather!) than my cuzzie bro's back home aw!Hammy wrote:
Kiwisteve- Posts : 1420
Join date : 2012-01-25
Age : 61
Location : Coffs Coast
Re: B1200 vs B1250
My chart had 132+hp with lines jagged at the top like that, but he smooth it out, which dropped it by 2hpkewwig wrote:And here's the copy of the dyno pull
Re: B1200 vs B1250
so,i found my dyno pull from 07 on my 03 1200,at the time had 75000km on it..all i`ve got on is a yosh can, no headers or air box mods done,and was tuned for mid range,not up top, as you can see by the drop off at about 8500rpm and typical 1200 bandit peeks at 9200rpm
mtbeerwah- Posts : 1787
Join date : 2010-02-20
Location : Brisbane
Re: B1200 vs B1250
Impressive from just a pipe change and lean as buggery jetting. I found that shifting at 8,500rpm as opposed to 9,500rpm (on my '06 1200s) at the drags dropped my times by about .3 sec but also I had slightly slower trap speeds.
We must all remember though that all dynos are not equal and should really only be used as a reference to themselves to see if a change in mapping etc had a positive or negative effect.
We must all remember though that all dynos are not equal and should really only be used as a reference to themselves to see if a change in mapping etc had a positive or negative effect.
Ironman- Posts : 672
Join date : 2010-10-09
Location : ACT
Re: B1200 vs B1250
Full Throttle wrote:Impressive from just a pipe change and lean as buggery jetting. I found that shifting at 8,500rpm as opposed to 9,500rpm (on my '06 1200s) at the drags dropped my times by about .3 sec but also I had slightly slower trap speeds.
We must all remember though that all dynos are not equal and should really only be used as a reference to themselves to see if a change in mapping etc had a positive or negative effect.
absolutely right. So many variables
kewwig- Posts : 985
Join date : 2011-03-21
Re: B1200 vs B1250
It's true dyno's need to be calibrated very now and then. The bloke I went to said his got compared with a brand new one after his got rebuilt under warranty last year.
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
» What can a B1200 / B1250 take?
» b1250 noise help.
» B1250 Online Manual
» B1250 Air Box Mod
» suspension upgrades b1250 do it once do it right
» b1250 noise help.
» B1250 Online Manual
» B1250 Air Box Mod
» suspension upgrades b1250 do it once do it right
Page 2 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum